What should you do if one of your Directors name is appearing in list of disqualified Directors

The recent action of MCA disqualifying Directors has created chaos among the Companies. While the process has started few months back when MCA issued notices and subsequently struck off nearly 2 lakh of Companies. While the initial actions against Shell Companies were in isolation, it has not affected many companies. Considering the fact that MCA started striking off all the Companies which were non active or the Companies which has not done its filing for years.

However, after striking of Companies, now MCA has now issued list of nearly 1 lakh of individuals who are disqualified to be Directors under Section 164 (2) (a) of the Companies Act, 2013. The list contains all the Directors of previously struck off companies. While the move was somewhat expected, its after effects are creating more wobble in the compliance of various Companies.

As per Clause (a) of section 167(1), the office of a director shall become vacant in case, if he incurs any of the disqualifications specified in section 164. Since the list issued by MCA specifies names of Directors who are 'disqualified under Section 164 (2) (a)' of the Companies Act, 2013. It is believed that if a Director whose name is appearing in the list of 'Disqualified Directors', they are bound to vacate the office from all other Companies where they are Director.

Penalty for non compliance?

Penalty on Directors who is liable to vacate his office under Section 167

Penalty for violation of Section 167 (1)
Fine
Rs. 1 lakh to Rs. 5 lakh
Imprisonment
Upto 1 Year
Or Both


Penalty on Company whose Director are liable to vacate office under Section 167 (1) (a):

Since the onus of intimation is on Director, who has incurred disqualification under Section 167 (1), if the Director fails to intimate the Company, the Company is not liable for any penalty. However, recently MCA issued warning to Companies stating that 'Filing of any document or application with ROC/MCA shall be summarily  rejected, if the same are signed by the Directors disqualified under Section 164(2) read with section 167 of the Companies Act, 2013.'


Which means that, though Company, may not be directly liable for any punishment as contravention of Section 167 is treated at individual level only. However, the Company may face consequences of allowing disqualified director to continue on its Board.

Click here to know What next for Directors who are disqualified.


Disclaimer: 
The entire contents of this document have been developed on the basis of relevant information and are purely the views of the author. Though the author has made utmost efforts to provide authentic information, however, the author expressly disclaim all or any liability to any person who has read this document, or otherwise, in respect of anything, and of consequences of anything done, or omitted to be done by any such person in reliance upon the contents of this document. READER SHOULD SEEK APPROPRIATE COUNSEL FOR THEIR RESPECTIVE SITUATION. AUTHOR SHALL NOT BE HELD LIABLE FOR ANY OF THE CONSEQUENCES DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is Corporate Identity Number (CIN)?

Image
Corporate Identity Number ( CIN ) , is a unique 21 digit Alpha-Numeric Code issued by Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) for all the Companies registered under Companies Act, 2013.  Here in the example above, we have taken CIN of Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) from MCA Website  and code is broken into different categories for reader to understand the structure of CIN with ease. 1) Listing Status - First Alphabet First Letter (alphabet) of CIN suggests Listing Status of the Company. Where L  indicates, the Company is listed on recognised stock exchange in India and U indicates it is unlisted Company 2 to 5) Industry Code - next 5 numbers Immediately, after Listing status, CIN has 5 numeric digits which represents Industry Code of the Company. Every Company, registered under Companies Act, 2013, has a Main Object. All those main objects are divided into few broad categories and these 5 digits represents the major activity or the industry of the C...
Read more

Conversion of LLP into Company

The concept of Limited Liability Partnership (LLP), was introduced in India by way of Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 and LLP Rules, 2009. As name suggest, in case of LLP, all partners have limited liabilities.  LLP is hybrid of Partnership Firm and Company, it is an alternative corporate form of business organization which gives the benefits of limited liability of a Company and the flexibility of a Partnership. As per LLP Act, read with relevant Rules, any other form of business such as a partnership set up under the provisions of Indian Partnership Act, 1932, a private limited company and an unlisted public limited company can convert itself into LLP pursuant to the provisions of LLP Act, 2008. However, neither of LLP Act nor Companies Act, 1956 provided a provision for conversion of LLP into Private Limited Company. However, with Companies Act, 2013 a provision of conversion of LLP into Private Company was introduced under Section 366 of the Companies Act, 2013...
Read more

Non Appointment of Company Secretary – NCLT fines Rs. 339,000 to the Company for inadvertent delay

Atyati Technologies Private Limited (The Company) was incorporated under Companies Act, 1956 as a Private Limited Company with Registered Office in Bangalore. The Paid-up capital of the Company was Rs. 8.81 Crores. As per Rule 8A, it is mandatory for every company to appoint a Company Secretary in all the Companies having Paid up capital of Rs. 5 Crores or more. The Company filed a suo-motto filed a petition under Section 203 of the Companies Act, 2013 (The Act) read with Rule 8A of Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014 with a prayer for compounding violation committed under Section 441 of the Act. The Company pleaded that though since the commencement of new Companies Act, 2013, i.e. April 01, 2014 the Company could not appoint any Professional as a CS as no CS was willing to work with the Company as Company being a Private Limited Company there was very limited scope of work. As per Section 203 (5), if a company contravenes the provision...
Read more