President grants assent to Ordinance to amend Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016


The President of India has given his assent today to the Ordinance to amend the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (the Code). The Ordinance aims at putting in place safeguards to prevent unscrupulous, undesirable persons from misusing or vitiating the provisions of the Code. The amendments aim to keep out such persons who have wilfully defaulted, are associated with non-performing assets, or are habitually non-compliant and, therefore, are likely to be a risk to successful resolution of insolvency of a company. In addition to putting in place restrictions for such persons to participate in the resolution or liquidation process, the amendment also provides such check by specifying that the Committee of Creditors ensure the viability and feasibility of the resolution plan before approving it. The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) has also been given additional powers


The Ordinance amends sections 2, 5, 25, 30, 35 and 240 of the Code, and inserts new sections 29A and 235A in the Code.

Gist of the amendments is given below:

(i)             Clause (e) of section 2 of the Code has been substituted with three clauses. This would facilitate the commencement of Part III of the Code relating to individuals and partnership firms in phases.

(ii)            Clause (25) and (26) of section 5 of the Code which define “resolution applicant” and “resolution applicant” are amended to provide clarity.

(iii)          Section 25(2)(h) of the Code is amended to enable the resolution professional, with the approval of the committee of creditors (CoC), to specify eligibility conditions while inviting resolution plans from prospective resolution applicants keeping in view the scale and complexity of operations of business of the corporate debtor to avoid frivolous applicants.

(iv)          Section 29A is a new section that makes certain persons ineligible to be a resolution applicant. Those being made ineligible inter alia include

·         willful defaulters,
·         those who have their accounts classified as non-performing assets for one year or more and are unable to settle their overdue amounts include interest thereon and charges relating to the account before submission of the resolution plan,
·         those who have executed an enforceable guarantee in favour of a creditor, in respect of a corporate debtor undergoing a corporate insolvency resolution process or liquidation process under the Code
·         and connected persons to the above, such as those who are promoters or in management of control of the resolution applicant, or will be promoters or in management of control of corporate debtor during the implementation of the resolution plan, the holding company, subsidiary company, associate company or related party of the above referred persons.

(v)            It has also been specifically provided that CoC shall reject a resolution plan, which is submitted before the commencement of the Ordinance but is yet to be approved, and where the resolution applicant is not eligible as per the new section 29A. In such cases, on account of the rejection, where there is no other plan available with the CoC, it may invite fresh resolution plans.

(vi)          Section 30(4) is amended to explicitly obligate the CoC to consider feasibility and viability of the resolution plan in addition to such conditions as may be specified by IBBI, before according its approval.

(vii)         The sale of property to a person who is ineligible to be a resolution applicant under section 29A has been barred through the amendment in section 35(1)(f).

(viii)        In order to ensure that the provisions of the Code and the rules and regulations prescribed thereunder are enforced effectively, the new section 235A provides for punishment for contravention of the provisions where no specific penalty or punishment is provided. The punishment is fine which shall not be less than one lakh rupees but which may extend to two crore rupees.

(ix)          Consequential amendments in section 240 of the Code, which provides for power to make regulations by IBBI, have been made for regulating making powers under section 25(2)(h) and 30(4).

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is Corporate Identity Number (CIN)?

Image
Corporate Identity Number ( CIN ) , is a unique 21 digit Alpha-Numeric Code issued by Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) for all the Companies registered under Companies Act, 2013.  Here in the example above, we have taken CIN of Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) from MCA Website  and code is broken into different categories for reader to understand the structure of CIN with ease. 1) Listing Status - First Alphabet First Letter (alphabet) of CIN suggests Listing Status of the Company. Where L  indicates, the Company is listed on recognised stock exchange in India and U indicates it is unlisted Company 2 to 5) Industry Code - next 5 numbers Immediately, after Listing status, CIN has 5 numeric digits which represents Industry Code of the Company. Every Company, registered under Companies Act, 2013, has a Main Object. All those main objects are divided into few broad categories and these 5 digits represents the major activity or the industry of the C...
Read more

Conversion of LLP into Company

The concept of Limited Liability Partnership (LLP), was introduced in India by way of Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008 and LLP Rules, 2009. As name suggest, in case of LLP, all partners have limited liabilities.  LLP is hybrid of Partnership Firm and Company, it is an alternative corporate form of business organization which gives the benefits of limited liability of a Company and the flexibility of a Partnership. As per LLP Act, read with relevant Rules, any other form of business such as a partnership set up under the provisions of Indian Partnership Act, 1932, a private limited company and an unlisted public limited company can convert itself into LLP pursuant to the provisions of LLP Act, 2008. However, neither of LLP Act nor Companies Act, 1956 provided a provision for conversion of LLP into Private Limited Company. However, with Companies Act, 2013 a provision of conversion of LLP into Private Company was introduced under Section 366 of the Companies Act, 2013...
Read more

Non Appointment of Company Secretary – NCLT fines Rs. 339,000 to the Company for inadvertent delay

Atyati Technologies Private Limited (The Company) was incorporated under Companies Act, 1956 as a Private Limited Company with Registered Office in Bangalore. The Paid-up capital of the Company was Rs. 8.81 Crores. As per Rule 8A, it is mandatory for every company to appoint a Company Secretary in all the Companies having Paid up capital of Rs. 5 Crores or more. The Company filed a suo-motto filed a petition under Section 203 of the Companies Act, 2013 (The Act) read with Rule 8A of Companies (Appointment and Remuneration of Managerial Personnel) Rules, 2014 with a prayer for compounding violation committed under Section 441 of the Act. The Company pleaded that though since the commencement of new Companies Act, 2013, i.e. April 01, 2014 the Company could not appoint any Professional as a CS as no CS was willing to work with the Company as Company being a Private Limited Company there was very limited scope of work. As per Section 203 (5), if a company contravenes the provision...
Read more